Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 11:55

Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Miley Cyrus Recalls How She Used to 'Hide' Drug Spending From Her Accountant - TooFab
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Can you provide a list of cities named after animals and the animals they were named after?
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
The Surprising Way Five Days Of Junk Food Impacts Your Brain - MindBodyGreen
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
NBA Finals’ 17 best players ranked for Thunder vs. Pacers series - SBNation.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.